Project · Quality & Operations

Quality Management &
Non-Conformance Control

Led end-to-end quality management on the production line — from reactive non-conformance treatment to systemic corrective actions, standard work creation and scrap cost reduction — achieving a 20% reduction in scrap and quality costs.

Non-Conformance Management Root Cause Analysis SAP Quality Module Scrap Cost Reduction Standard Work QSC Leadership

Impact at a glance

Key Numbers

500+
Non-conformances treated & closed
-20%
Reduction in scrap & quality costs
<24h
Reactive NC treatment for production
20+
Standard Work instructions created & updated
1/mo
QSC meeting led with management & frontline
5 Why
Ishikawa · Pareto · Root cause methodology

Context

Challenges

Challenge 01

High volume of non-conformances impacting production flow — requiring fast reactive treatment without stopping the line

Challenge 02

Scrap costs representing a significant share of COMS — identifying high-cost recurring defects and eliminating root causes

Challenge 03

Lack of standardized work instructions — operators executing tasks differently, generating variability and quality deviations

Challenge 04

Quality controls insufficient or not systematically applied throughout the process — gaps in MES quality checkpoints

Challenge 05

Limited visibility on scrap costs — no structured tracking making it difficult to prioritize corrective actions by financial impact

What I did

Actions Taken

1
Reactive Treatment

Non-Conformance Investigation & Treatment — Under 24h

Treated 500+ non-conformances with a reactive approach ensuring production continuity — all critical NCs investigated and actioned within 24 hours to minimize line stoppage impact.

On-site investigation with operators at the workstation5 Why, Ishikawa & Pareto analysis for root cause identificationHistorical data analysis to identify recurring patternsNC treatment and closure in SAP quality module
2
CAPA

Corrective & Preventive Action Plans

Defined and tracked structured CAPA plans for each significant non-conformance — distinguishing between immediate corrective actions to restore production and long-term preventive measures to eliminate recurrence.

Short-term corrective actions — contain the defect, restore productionLong-term preventive actions — process modification, control reinforcementAction ownership assigned with deadlines and follow-up
3
QSC Leadership

Monthly QSC Meeting — Management & Frontline

Led monthly Quality Safety Cost (QSC) meetings with management and first-line supervisors — presenting serious scrap cases (high-cost NCs), investigation findings and decided action plans. Ensured full transparency and accountability at all levels.

Serious NC presentation — root cause + financial impactAction plan validation with managementKPI review — scrap cost trend, NC closure rate
4
Standardization

Standard Work Creation & Update — 20+ Instructions

Created and updated 20+ Standard Work instructions to eliminate task variability — documenting the correct execution method for critical operations, integrating quality control checkpoints and making instructions accessible directly at the workstation.

5

Operator Training on Quality Standards

Delivered hands-on training to operators on quality standards, correct execution of critical operations and proper NC reporting — building a quality-first culture on the shopfloor and reducing operator-induced defects.

6
MES Integration

Quality Control Reinforcement — Added to MES

Identified process steps with insufficient quality controls and integrated additional control checkpoints directly into MES — ensuring operators are systematically prompted to perform quality checks at critical stages, making quality control mandatory and traceable.

7
Cost Tracking

Scrap Cost Calculation & Monitoring

Implemented structured scrap cost tracking — calculating the financial impact of each defect category, prioritizing actions by cost impact using Pareto analysis, and monitoring the cost trend over time to measure the effectiveness of corrective actions.

Outcomes

Results

-20% scrap & quality costs

Sustained reduction in scrap cost and NC-related expenses through CAPA and standardization

500+ NCs treated & closed

All critical non-conformances actioned within 24h — zero production stoppage due to pending NC

20+ Standard Work created

Standardized critical operations eliminating task variability and operator-induced defects

Quality culture strengthened

Operators trained, MES controls added, QSC meetings embedded as monthly governance ritual

Full cost visibility on scrap

Structured tracking enabling data-driven prioritization of corrective actions by financial impact

MES quality controls enforced

Critical checkpoints added directly into MES — quality control mandatory and fully traceable

Stack

Tools & Methods

SAP Quality Module
MES / MEPOD
5 Why Analysis
Ishikawa Diagram
Pareto Analysis
QSC Meetings
Standard Work
CAPA
Scrap Cost Tracking
Root Cause Analysis

“Treated 500+ non-conformances with a reactive, data-driven approach — combining terrain investigation, structured CAPA, standard work creation and MES quality reinforcement to achieve a 20% reduction in scrap and quality costs while embedding a lasting quality culture on the shopfloor.”